SMT. SANTOSH JOHAR versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SMT. SANTOSH JOHAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB & Anr - CRM-42861-M-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 1557 (9 March 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 42861-M OF 2005

DATE OF DECISION: 21.03.2006

SMT. SANTOSH JOHAR

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr L.M. Gulati, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr G.S. Bhandari, DAG, Punjab.

Mr Vikram K. Chaudhri, Advocate

---

ORDER:

This petition has been filed for quashing.

The petitioner is mother-in-law. Respondent No.2 in FIR, Annexure P-3, has made allegations against her, which will require to be tried. The petition for quashing is not a substitute for trial. Prayer for quashing cannot be accepted on the ground that the version of the complainant is false. No ground is, thus, made out for quashing.

The petition is dismissed.

March 21, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.