High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
SMT. SANTOSH JOHAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB & Anr - CRM-42861-M-2005  RD-P&H 1557 (9 March 2006)
CRL. MISC. NO. 42861-M OF 2005
DATE OF DECISION: 21.03.2006
SMT. SANTOSH JOHAR
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr L.M. Gulati, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr G.S. Bhandari, DAG, Punjab.
Mr Vikram K. Chaudhri, Advocate
This petition has been filed for quashing.
The petitioner is mother-in-law. Respondent No.2 in FIR, Annexure P-3, has made allegations against her, which will require to be tried. The petition for quashing is not a substitute for trial. Prayer for quashing cannot be accepted on the ground that the version of the complainant is false. No ground is, thus, made out for quashing.
The petition is dismissed.
March 21, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.