High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
NARINDER SINGH v. MRS.SHASHI SAHNI & Ors - CR-606-2006  RD-P&H 159 (16 January 2006)
Civil Revision No.606 of 2006
Date of Decision: 2.02.2006
Mrs.Shashi Sahni and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner JUDGMENT
Vide order, under challenge, after death of their mother, application of the respondents, for amendment of the application, for ejectment of the petitioner, has been allowed by the Court below. This Court feels that as the matter is still pending before the rent controller and petitioner can prove that the plea taken by them is false. As such, no prejudice has been caused to the petitioner by passing of the impugned order. Otherwise also, the respondents are entitled to file a fresh application.
With a view to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings, this Court feels that the order passed is perfectly justified. No case is made out for interference.
February 02, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.