High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Amar Singh v. Sadhu Singh & Ors - FAO-3210-2005  RD-P&H 1620 (10 March 2006)
F.A.O. NO. 3210 of 2005 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: March 10, 2006.
Sadhu Singh and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. J. S. Bhandohal,
Advocate, for the appellant.
CM No. 13864-C II of 2005
This application has been filed under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. Application is accompanied by an affidavit. In view of reasoning given in the application, it is allowed and delay in refiling the appeal is condoned.
CM No. 13863-C II of 2005
This application has been filed under Section 149 read with Section 151 CPC for making up deficiency in Court fee. Application is accompanied by an affidavit. In view of reasoning given in the application, it is allowed and delay in making good deficiency in Court fee stands condoned.
FAO No. 3210 of 2005
The appellant is a defeated candidate in election to the post of Sarpanch of village Ajner. He filed an election petition stating that actually number of votes polled was 765, whereas at the time of counting, only 760 votes were available. After recording evidence, his election petition was dismissed. The Tribunal below, by referring to the statement made by the appellant himself and also by the officials, observed that the votes polled were only 760 and the appellant has made the allegation even without looking into requisite records. Except making his own bald statement, appellant has not brought on record any evidence, in the shape of applications made to any higher authority, immediately after election that his votes were wrongly rejected. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed.
March 10, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.