High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Surender Kumar v. Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak & An - CWP-16996-2003  RD-P&H 1670 (16 March 2006)
Civil Writ Petition No.16996 of 2003
Date of decision: March 09, 2006.
Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak & Anr.
Mr. D.L. Gupta, Advocate for
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SARON
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. S.S. Saron, J. (Oral)
Learned Counsel for respondent No.1 fairly states that the present case is covered against him by the decision of this Court in CWP No.11877 of 2000 (Meera Devi & Ors. v. Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak and Ors.), decided on December 01, 2005.
Keeping in view the said decision, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms.
[ S.S. Saron ]
March 09, 2006. [ Surya Kant ]
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.