Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAI KISHAN versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jai Kishan v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and - CWP-5117-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 2016 (27 March 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5117 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: March 31, 2006

Jai Kishan

.....Petitioner

VERSUS

Haryana Urban Development Authority and another ....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN

PRESENT: Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

M. M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is for issuance of a direction to the respondents to allot a plot to the petitioner out of oustees quota in Sector 12, Sonepat. For the relief claimed in the petition, the petitioner has already served a legal notice through his counsel on 1.2.2006 (P-3) wherein all the detailed facts have been given.

Without going into the merits of the controversy raised in the writ petition and refraining ourselves from expressing any opinion thereon, we deem it just and proper to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice issued by the petitioner through his counsel and decide the same in accordance with the policies applicable to the oustees with regard to C.W.P. No.5117 of 2006 : 2 :

the allotment of a plot. The petitioner shall be given a personal hearing before taking any decision on merit. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the respondents. If the petitioner is found entitled to allotment of a plot under the oustees quota, the same may be allotted to him within four weeks thereafter or if there is a draw, the name of the petitioner be considered in the same.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

( M. M. KUMAR )

JUDGE

March 31 , 2006 ( T. P. S. MANN )

khurmi JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.