Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BIR SINGH versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bir Singh v. Union Territory, Chandigarh & Ors. - CWP-10452-2003 [2006] RD-P&H 221 (20 January 2006)

CWP No. 10452 of 2003 Page numbers

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

CWP No. 10452 of 2003

Date of decision: 6.2.2006

Bir Singh

....Petitioner

Versus

Union Territory, Chandigarh and others.

....Respondents

Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal

Present: Mr. K.K. Saini, Advocate for

Mr. P.K. Kukreja, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate

for the respondents.

...

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral).

Through the impugned orders dated 4.4.2001 (Annexure P-1), 20.6.2002 (Annexure P-2) and 30.10.2002 (Annexure P-3), the allotment of plot in favour of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the alleged CWP No. 10452 of 2003 Page numbers

violations against the sanctioned building plan. On the last date of hearing, the respondents were required to seek a report from the concerned Sectional Officer so as to verify, whether or not, there are still building violations on the plot in question. Learned counsel for the respondents has handed over to us the status report in Court today. The same is taken on record and marked as Annexure 'A'. A perusal of Annexure 'A' reveals, that all building violations have since been removed.

In view of the above, we are satisfied, that the plot which was allotted to the petitioner and was resumed on account of the building violations, should be restored to him since the petitioner has removed all the building violations. Accordingly, the impugned orders, referred to above, are hereby set aside. The petitioner is directed to move an appropriate application within one month from today for renewal of the licence to occupy the plot in question.

Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge.

(S.N. Aggarwal)

Judge.

06.02.2006

CWP No. 10452 of 2003 Page numbers

sk.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.