Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PARKASH SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Parkash Singh v. State of Punjab - CRM-67677-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 2290 (4 April 2006)

Crl. Misc. No.67677-M of 2005 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.67677-M of 2005

Date of decision: April 21, 2006.

Parkash Singh

...Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

Present: Shri Vikrant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri B.S. Sewak, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab.

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

The prayer in this petition is to release the petitioner on regular bail in FIR No.322 dated 22.11.2004, under section 15/61/85 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Muktsar.

Bail has been sought by the petitioner primarily on the ground that his health condition is precarious and he requires regular check up/treatment including 'indoor treatment' from the PGIMS, Chandigarh.

On March 31, 2006, the SSP, Muktsar was directed to get a Medical Board constituted from the Civil Surgeon, Muktsar for the petitioner's examination and thereafter to submit the report along with his affidavit.

In deference to the aforementioned directions, the SSP, Muktsar has filed an affidavit dated April 20, 2006, para 2 of which reads as follows:-

Crl. Misc. No.67677-M of 2005 - 2 -

"2. That according to opinion/report of medical Board, the Board of Doctors has opined that "In our combined opinion general conditions of the patient is stable and satisfactory.

However, he needs regular medical treatment as prescribed by P.G.I. Chandigarh." The opinion of the Board of Doctors in original is attached as Annexure R-I." Along with the affidavit, the opinion given by the Medical Board has also been appended, which is taken on record.

Since the petitioner has been provided medical treatment from the PGIMS, Chandigarh and presently his condition is stable and satisfactory, no case for grant of bail at this stage, is made out. However, in order to ensure that the petitioner's health condition does not deteriorate for want of proper treatment, this petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

(i)SSP, Muktsar and Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Muktsar shall ensure that an expert Medical Officer examines the petitioner periodically;

(ii) the petitioner shall be provided all the medical facilities including medicines, if any, may be as prescribed by the PGIMS, Chandigarh;

(iii) if so required, the petitioner shall also be provided indoor treatment from the PGIMS, Chandigarh.

Disposed of.

April 21, 2006. [ Surya Kant ]

kadyan Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.