High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Ram Parkash Tyagi v. Union of India & Anr - CWP-1196-2006  RD-P&H 2313 (5 April 2006)
C.W.P. No. 2269 of 2004
Date of Decision: 01.05.2006
Sant Lal and others
State of Haryana & others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana,
for the respondents.
M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record instructions dated 16.3.2006, showing that the Scheduled Caste employees are to be entitled to accelerated seniority as a consequence of promotions under the reservation policy. The aforementioned position is to come into force with immediate effect and is to have prospective effect only. The instruction dated 16.3.2006 are taken on record as Mark-A.
As the main prayer in the writ petition made by the petitioners was with regard to implementation of the 86th Amendment of the
Constitution, we find that the aforementioned prayer has now been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous.
May 1, 2006 JUDGE
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.