High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Krishan Devi v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-6036-2006  RD-P&H 2323 (6 April 2006)
C.W.P. No. 6036 OF 2006
Date of Decision: 28.4.2006
State of Haryana and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition was filed when no averment could be made pleading that the petitioner has been appointed by an advertisement, inviting of application from all the candidates eligible for the post and then selecting her in accordance with the procedure prescribed by rules consistent with Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution. The aforementioned procedure has been held to be basic structure of the Constitution by Constitution Bench in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & others v. Umadevi & others, JT 2006(4) SC 420.
Learned counsel has requested for withdrawal of the petition with permission to file a fresh one if the aforementioned requirements are satisfied by pleading the material showing that the compliance of the aforementioned procedure was made.
C.W.P. No. 6036 of 2006
In view of the above, we accept the request made by the learned counsel and allow withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one if the aforementioned material is available and brought on record.
April 28, 2006 JUDGE
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.