Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BALJIT KAUR versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Baljit Kaur v. Union of India & Ors - CWP-1837-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 239 (20 January 2006)

CWP NO. 1837 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO. 1837 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 07.02.2006

Baljit Kaur ....Petitioner.

Versus

Union of India and others ...Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

PRESENT: Mr. Ravi Badyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

The solitary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents are likely to terminate the service of the petitioner in the immediate future. It is with the aforesaid apprehension that the petitioner has approached this Court, so as to stall the action of the respondents.

In our view, the petitioner has approached this Court, prematurely without there being any adverse action taken against him. We are disinclined to interfere with the claim raised by the petitioner at this CWP NO. 1837 OF 2006 2

stage since the same is premature.

Dismissed.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.N. Aggarwal)

February 07, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.