Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARISH KUMAR BHATIA & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harish Kumar Bhatia & Ors v. State of Haryana & Anr - CWP-1872-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 244 (20 January 2006)

CWP NO. 1872 OF 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO. 1872 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 07.02.2006

Harish Kumar Bhatia & others ...Petitioners.

Versus

State of Haryana and another ....Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

PRESENT: Mr.R.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

The petitioners were allegedly inducted into the employment of the Transport Department, Haryana, on contract basis against different posts. They claim to have been appointed during the period commencing from December 1994 to January 2000. On the basis of the continuous service rendered by the petitioners, they claim regularisation under the policy instructions issued by the State Government. Prior to approaching this Court, the petitioners are stated to have made a representation dated 6.9.2005 (Annexure P3). It is, however, pointed out that no decision has ben taken thereon till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will CWP NO. 1872 OF 2006 2

be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. the Transport Commissioner, Haryana, requiring him to take a final decision on his representation dated 6.9.2005 (Annexure P3).

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.2 i.e. the Transport Commissioner, Haryana, to take a final decision on the representation dated 6.9.2005 (Annexure P3)., by passing a well reasoned speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It will be appreciated if respondent No.2 while passing the aforesaid order, takes into consideration the decision rendered by this Court in Rajesh Kakkar & another V. State of Haryana and another (CWP No.9397 of 2004 decided on 7.4.2005) and any other relevant judgment on the point.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.N. Aggarwal)

February 07, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.