Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAMBHU DAYAL & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shambhu Dayal & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-1992-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 249 (23 January 2006)

CWP NO.1992 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.1992 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 9.2.2006

Shambhu Dayal and others ..Petitioners.

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

PRESENT: Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioners.

J.S. Khehar, J. (oral)

The petitioners claim enhanced retiral benefits in terms of the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No.7446 of 2003 decided on 23.9.2005. In the aforesaid context, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners, relying on the judgment referred to above, issued a legal notice to the respondents dated 7.11.2005 (Annexure P4). However, no decision has been taken thereon by the respondents till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 i.e. the Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, and the Director, Primary Education, Haryana, requiring them to take a final CWP NO.1992 of 2006 2

decision on the legal notice dated 7.11.2005 (Annexure P4).

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondents No.2 and 3 i.e. the Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, and the Director, Primary Education, Haryana, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 7.11.2005 (Annexure P4) by passing a well reasoned speaking order, within two months of the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. It would be appreciated if respondents No.2 and 3 while passing the aforesaid order take into consideration the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No.7446 of 2003 as well as any other judgment relevant to the issue. In case, the petitioners are found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to them within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

( S.N. Aggarwal)

February 9, 2006. Judge

vig


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.