High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
H.S.E.B now Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran N v. Jasoda Rani - RSA-2030-2004  RD-P&H 256 (23 January 2006)
R.S.A. No.2030 of 2004
Date of Decision: 9.2.2006
H.S.E.B now Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam through the A.E.E. Operation City Sub Division, Jagadhri and another Vs.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present:- Shri Paras Money Goyal, Advocate for the appellants.
Respondent- plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction with a prayer that the appellants- defendants be restrained from disconnecting her electric connection and further that the appellants be restrained from recovering any amount which actually is due from her tenant. Suit was decreed. Appellants failed in appeal.
It has come on record that the respondent is not a defaulter. It was her tenant, who has not paid the amount to the appellants for electricity consumption. Neither the respondent nor any other member of his family, was guarantor of the said tenant. In view of findings recorded by the appellate Court below in para No.11 of its judgment under challenge, no case is made out for interference.
February 9, 2006 ( JASBIR SINGH )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.