Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

POOJA SHARMA @ BHAWANA SHARMA. versus SATISH KUMAR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


POOJA SHARMA @ BHAWANA SHARMA. v. SATISH KUMAR. - CM-16160-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 26 (6 January 2006)

C.M. No. 16160-CII of 2004. (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.M. No. 16160-CII of 2004.

Date of Decision: 24.1.2006.

Pooja Sharma @ Bhawana Sharma. ...Petitioner.

Versus

Satish Kumar. ...Respondent.

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta.

Present: Shri Ajay Sangroha, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Shri Robin Dutt, Advocate,

for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has sought transfer of petition filed by the respondent under Section 7 read with Section 10 of the Guardian and Ward Act, 1890 (hereinafter to be referred as `the Act'), for appointment of Guardian with respect to the person of minor. The said petition has been filed at Jagadhri. In the petition, it has been pleaded that the minor is residing with his mother in her paternal house, which falls within the jurisdiction Tehsil Dera Bassi, District Rajpura.

C.M. No. 16160-CII of 2004. (2)

The petitioner has sought transfer of the said petition to Rajpura on the ground that the petitioner's life is under threat as the respondent is a man of criminal nature and the respondent may exercise his influence against her.

Once it is the admitted stand of the respondent that the minor is staying with his mother at Dera Bassi falling within the jurisdiction of Tehsil Dera Bassi, District Rajpura, the petition for appointment of a Guardian is maintainable, only before the Courts at Rajpura.

Consequently, the present petition is allowed. The case No. 75- G of 24.11.2003 Satish Kumar Vs. Pooja Sharma, pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Jagadhri, exercising the powers under the Guardian & Ward Act, shall stand transferred to the competent Court at Rajpura.

Parties through their counsel are directed appear before the learned District Patiala on 7.3.2006 on which date the learned District Judge shall entrust the case to the competent Court at Rajpura.

24.1.2006. (Hemant Gupta)

ds Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.