Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURJIT SINGH KALSI versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Surjit Singh Kalsi v. State of Punjab & Anr - CWP-3145-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 2715 (28 April 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P.No.3145 of 2005

Date of Decision: 25 - 4 - 2006

Surjit Singh Kalsi ........Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab and another .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.PATWALIA

***

Present: Mr.V.K.Sharma, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab

for the respondents.

***

J.S.KHEHAR, J. (Oral)

The petitioner claims retiral benefits. These benefits have been denied to the petitioner on account of pendency of departmental proceedings under the provisions of Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970. It is, therefore, apparent that till a final decision is taken on the departmental proceedings, it may be difficult to take a final decision regarding retiral benefits payable to him.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that all the departmental proceedings pending against the petitioner under the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 will be concluded within three months from today. He also states that final decision on the representation made by the petitioner against the adverse remarks in the Annual Confidential Report for the year 1993-94 communicated to him, will be taken within the aforesaid period of CWP No.3145 of 2005 [2]

three months. Having disposed off the aforesaid proceedings which are stated to be pending against the petitioner, it is stated that the decks will be cleared and monetary benefits will be paid to the petitioner within a period of one month thereafter.

In view of the above, the respondents are directed to take a final decision on the representation made by the petitioner against his Annual Confidential Report for the year 1993-94 as well as all departmental proceedings pending against him under the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 within three months from today, and thereupon, to calculate and pay all retiral benefits, as also other monetary benefits payable to the petitioner, in terms of the statutory rules, within a further period of one month.

Disposed off accordingly.

Copy dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S.KHEHAR )

JUDGE

( P.S.PATWALIA )

April 25, 2006. JUDGE

RC


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.