Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUKHWINDER KAUR & ORS versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sukhwinder Kaur & Ors v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-7506-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 2718 (28 April 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P.No.7506 of 2004

Date of Decision: 17 - 4 - 2006

Sukhwinder Kaur and others ........Petitioners v.

State of Punjab and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.PATWALIA

***

Present: Mrs.K.K.Kahlon, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab

for the respondents.

***

J.S.KHEHAR, J. (Oral)

The petitioners were inducted into the service of the respondents as Anganwari Workers on a fixed honorarium. Since, the honorarium was not paid to the petitioners, they have approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition.

Out of 45 petitioners, 3 petitioners have already been paid their honorarium, and for the remaining petitioners, the respondents have brought cheques, so as to discharge the liability of honorarium payable to remaining 42 petitioners. 42 separate cheques have been handed over by learned counsel for the respondents to learned counsel for the petitioners in Court today. The aforesaid cheques have been accepted as payment in lieu of the honorarium payable to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, states that liberty be granted to the petitioners to claim any further amount that may be due to them, in CWP No.7506 of 2004 [2]

case the payment made in Court today is inadequate, by filing civil suits.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to seek any further amount that may be due to them from the respondents, by filing the civil suits, in case the amount paid by the respondents is found inadequate.

( J.S.KHEHAR )

JUDGE

( P.S.PATWALIA )

April 17, 2006. JUDGE

RC


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.