Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VANDANA ROHILA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vandana Rohila v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-7000-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 2766 (1 May 2006)

C.W.P. No. 7000 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 7000 of 2006

Date of Decision: May 8, 2006

Vandana Rohila

.....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. N.G. Sharma, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR. J. (ORAL)

Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the writ petition has been heard. The prayer made in the petition is for issuance of a writ of Mandamus seeking a direction to the respondents to decide her representation wherein she has claimed that her husband be given the status of Police Martyre, her husband full salary and other benefits till C.W.P. No. 7000 of 2006 [2]

superannuation instead of family pension, Special ex-gratia grant of Rs.5 lacs (which now has been declared as Rs.7.5 lacs), one Government job etc.

For the relief claimed in the present petition, the petitioner has already got served a representation dated 20.3.2006 (P-1) upon the respondents.

In view of above, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representation sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be meritorious and decided in her favour then the benefit accruing to the petitioner shall be disbursed within a further period of four months thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

May 8, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.