Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURINDER PAUL versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Surinder Paul v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-7070-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 2775 (2 May 2006)

C.W.P. No. 7070 of 2006 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 7070 of 2006

Date of Decision: May 9, 2006

Surinder Paul

.....Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. R.K.Gupta, Advocate

for the petitioner.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

A show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner on April 19, 2006 (P-11) and reply to the aforementioned show cause notice has been filed by the petitioner on May 5, 2006 (P-12), however, no final order has been passed.

Therefore, we find that the instant petition is wholly premature as it cannot be presumed, at this stage, that the respondent authorities are C.W.P. No. 7070 of 2006 [2]

likely to be passed an order necessarily against the petitioner. No direction would be warranted at this stage. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as premature.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

May 9, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.