Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DILDAR SINGH versus U.T., CHANDIGARH

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DILDAR SINGH v. U.T., CHANDIGARH - CRM-5796-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 295 (23 January 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 5796-M OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 15.2.2006

DILDAR SINGH

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

U.T., CHANDIGARH

...RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Veneet Sharma, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Ms Meenakshi Dogra, Advocate for

Mr R.S. Rai, Standing Counsel

for U.T., Chandigarh.

-----

ORDER:

Counsel for the State says that custody of the petitioner is not required for investigation.

In view of the above statement, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if custody of the petitioner is required in future, a notice of two weeks in advance will be given.

February 15, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.