High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
DILDAR SINGH v. U.T., CHANDIGARH - CRM-5796-2006  RD-P&H 295 (23 January 2006)
CRL. MISC. NO. 5796-M OF 2006
DATE OF DECISION: 15.2.2006
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Veneet Sharma, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms Meenakshi Dogra, Advocate for
Mr R.S. Rai, Standing Counsel
for U.T., Chandigarh.
Counsel for the State says that custody of the petitioner is not required for investigation.
In view of the above statement, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if custody of the petitioner is required in future, a notice of two weeks in advance will be given.
February 15, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.