High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
SAHDEV v. BELLI RAM & Anr - RSA-1183-2004  RD-P&H 30 (6 January 2006)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1183 of 2004
DATE OF DECISION: January 23, 2006.
Belli Ram and another
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. S.S. Kharb,
Advocate, for the appellant.
Respondent No. 1- plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction with a prayer that appellant respondent No. 2 be restrained from interfering in his possession over the property in dispute, description of which was given in his plaint. Suit was decreed.
Appellant failed in appeal. Both the Courts below, by taking note of numerous documents on record, have come to a conclusion that respondent No. 1 plaintiff was in possession of the property in dispute.
Contention of counsel for the appellant is that when entries were changed in the year 1984-85, notice was not given to him. It has specifically been noticed by the Courts below that even in that Jamabandi, appellant was not shown in possession. Rather, Sukhdev, Chanderpati, Kelawati and Omvati were shown in possession of the property in dispute and admittedly all these ladies had died much earlier. No case is made out for interference as no substantial question of law has been raised.
January 23, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.