Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANT KUMAR versus UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. &

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sant Kumar v. Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & - CWP-5906-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 3072 (11 May 2006)

IN THE HIGH COUART OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.5906 of 2005

DATE OF DECISION: 30-3-2006

Sant Kumar PETITIONERS.

VERSUS

Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & anr. RESPONDENTS.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.BEDI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA

PRESENT: Mr. S.P.Laler, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG Punjab.

H.S.BEDI,J:

The petitioner has admittedly been granted the appointment as of now. The only claim that remains is that the petitioner being higher in the merit, his date of appointment should be from the date when his juniors had been appointed. We find merit in this plea. We accordingly dispose of this writ petition as infructuous with a further direction that the petitioners would be entitled to count hisr date of appointment from the date when his juniors had got appointment for all intents and purposes, but he will not be entitled to payment of any arrears of salary. Dasti.

( H.S.BEDI)

JUDGE

30-3-2006 (VINOD K.SHARMA)

'dls' JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.