Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DALBIR KAUR & ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dalbir Kaur & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors. - CWP-8793-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3203 (16 May 2006)

CWP No. 8793 of 2006 Page numbers

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

CWP No. 8793 of 2006

Date of Decision: 30.5.2006

Dalbir Kaur and another.

....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others.

....Respondents.

Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Patwalia

Present: Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate

for the petitioners.

...

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral).

Having examined the issue in its totality, based on the pleadings of the instant writ petition, we are of the view, that the controversy raised by the petitioners would need an adjudication on facts.

Realising the aforesaid predicament, learned counsel for the petitioners states, that the petitioners will be satisfied, if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 i.e. the District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Gurdaspur, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice issued by the petitioners on 22.2.2006 (Annexure P-14).

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate CWP No. 8793 of 2006 Page numbers

General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4.

Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition by directing respondent No.4 i.e. the District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Gurdaspur, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 22.2.2006 (Annexure P-14) by passing a well reasoned speaking order, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge.

( P.S. Patwalia )

Judge.

30.05.2006

sk.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.