Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUBASH & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Subash & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-7142-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3287 (18 May 2006)

C.W.P. No.7142 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 7142 of 2006

Date of decision: May 11,2006

Subash and others v. State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

Present: Shri S.P.Khatri,Advocate, for the petitioners.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral)

Notice of motion to the respondents.

Shri Ajay Gulati, Assistant Advocate General,Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 on the asking of the Court.

Shri Ajay Nara, Advocate, on the asking of the Court also accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 to 5.

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The grievance made by the petitioners is that an application filed by them for the allotment of plot under the Ustee's quota has been rejected only on the ground that along with the application, earnest money had not been deposited by the petitioners. However, from the perusal of the averments made in the present petition, we find that at no point of time the price of the plot had been fixed. In these circumstances, the petitioners obviously could not be expected to deposit any earnest money.

Consequently, we dispose of the present petition and it is directed that the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, C.W.P. No.7142 of 2006 2

Sonepat, shall reconsider the claim of the petitioners. If the petitioners are required to deposit any earnest money, the same shall be communicated to them and thereafter, their claim shall be considered in accordance with law.

The necessary process in this regard shall be completed by the Estate Officer within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received.

A copy of this order be give dasti on payment of usual charges.

( Viney Mittal )

Judge

May 11,2006 ( H.S. Bhalla )

sks Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.