Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURINDER KAUR versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Surinder Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors - RSA-4857-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 331 (24 January 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.4857 of 2003(O&M)

Date of Decision: 9.02.2006

Parties Name

Surinder Kaur

Appellant

versus

State of Punjab and others

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the appellant JUDGMENT

Civil Misc. No.1286-C of 2006

This application has been moved with a prayer to recall order dated 3.2.2006, vide which, appeal was dismissed for non prosecution. In view of averments made in this application, which is accompanied by an affidavit, it is allowed, order dated 3.2.2006 is recalled and appeal is restored to its original number. On request made the appeal is taken up for hearing today itself.

RSA No.4857 of 2003

Appellant-plaintiff filed a suit, claiming damages on account of illegal harassment, mental torture, loss of reputation, financial loss, unnecessary litigation and loss in business etc. It was her case that due to mis-management, while constructing a dam, her crop was damaged and on account of that she suffered the losses, as claimed by her. Her suit was dismissed. She also failed in appeal.

Both the Courts below have found that the evidence runs contrary to the pleadings. Furthermore, no evidence has been brought on record, as to whether any crop was standing and the same was damaged, as alleged. It has also been noticed by the Courts below that the witnesses produced by the appellant, have failed to support her case. In view of findings recorded by the appellate Court below in paragraph Nos.8 to 11, this Court feels that no case is made out for interference in pure findings of fact as counsel has failed to raise any substantial question of law at the time of arguments.

Dismissed.

February 09, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.