Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF HARYANA versus SONU

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


State of Haryana v. Sonu - CR-756-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 334 (24 January 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.756 of 2006

Date of Decision: 9.02.2006

Parties Name

State of Haryana

Petitioner

versus

Sonu

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
Present: Shri M.S.Sindhu, DAG Haryana

JUDGMENT

Vide order, under challenge, application of the respondents to convert their claim application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (in short, the Act) to the one under Section 163-A of the Act, was allowed. Counsel states that the claim application made by the respondents, in view of dismissal of their earlier application, in default, was not maintainable and further that the provisions of Section 163-A of the Act are not applicable. These objections are still available to the petitioner and can be taken up before the Tribunal below. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed.

February 09, 2006 ( Jasbir Singh )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.