Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJWINDER SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajwinder Singh v. State of Punjab - CRM-33508-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3362 (23 May 2006)

Crl.M.No. 33508 M OF 2006.

******

Rajwinder Singh vs State of Punjab

Present : Mr.H.S.Sirohi, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

*******

The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.85, dated 12.7.2003, registered under Sections 420/467/468/471 of the IPC, at Police Station Kathu Nangal.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that though the allegations are with respect to forgery of a will, the parties have settled their dispute, as reflected in the compromise (Annexure P-1) and the affidavit (Annexure P- 2). It is further contended that on the date of alleged forgery, the petitioner was a minor and, therefore, there is no question of his having committed any forgery.

Counsel for the State of Punjab, on the other hand, contends that the petitioner remained a proclaimed offender for a period of five months and, therefore, he should not be released on bail.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Though the allegations are with respect to forgery and cheating, the complainant and the petitioner, being close relatives, have executed a compromise (Annexure P-1). The complainant has sworn an affidavit (Annexure P-2), to the effect that he has no dispute with the petitioner.

Even otherwise, as investigation is complete, and charges have been framed, no purpose would be served by incarcerating the petitioner any further.

Counsel for the State of Punjab has not expressed any apprehension that if released on bail, the petitioner would tamper with the prosecution evidence Crl.Misc.No.33508.M of 2006 : 2 :

or in any manner subvert the process of trial.

Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Amritsar.

Nothing, stated herein, shall be construed to be an expression of opinion, on the merits of the controversy.

( RAJIVE BHALLA )

July 04, 2006. JUDGE

`kk'


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.