High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Namrata Rani & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-596-2000  RD-P&H 3438 (25 May 2006)
C.W.P. No. 596 of 2000
Date of Decision: 4.7.2006
Namrata Rani and others
State of Haryana and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Hawa Singh Hooda, AG, Haryana, with
Mr. Jaswant Singh, Addl. AG, Haryana and Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)
This order shall dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 596, 816, 975, 1314, 1408, 1355, 1418, 2627, 2980, 2940, 249 & 4488 all of 2000 and 18056 of 1999.
A Division Bench of this Court vide orders dated 29.3.2000, 18.4.2000, 25.4.2000 and 27.4.2000 passed in the aforementioned writ petitions, had directed the respondents to interview the petitioners of the aforementioned writ petitions provisionally for the posts he/she/they had applied by assuming that all the candidates had the requisite qualifications for the post. It was further directed that if they make a grade on merit prepared by the C.W.P. No. 596 of 2000
respondents then appointment letters were to be issued to them subject to further orders that may be passed in these petitions. A stipulation to that effect was required to be inserted in the appointment letters. In pursuance to the directions issued by the Division Bench, the petitioners in both the petitions were interviewed but they could not able to make a grade and accordingly not selected.
This statement has been made by the learned Advocate General on the basis of a chart prepared.
In view of above, these petitions are without merit and accordingly the same are dismissed.
July 4, 2006
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.