Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINOD KUMAR versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA - CRM-6508-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 352 (24 January 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRL. MISC. NO. 6508-M OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 16.2.2006

VINOD KUMAR

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
PRESENT: Mr Krishan Singh, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr Rameshwar Malik, Addl. AG, Haryana.

-----

ORDER:

Heard.

Offence alleged is under sections 420/467/468/471/120-B/109/ 113 IPC.

It is stated that the petitioner is in custody since 18.11.2005 and no challan has been presented and thus, the petitioner is entitled to bail under section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This factual aspect is not disputed by counsel for the State.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner is granted bail to the satisfaction of CJM/ Duty Magistrate, Kaithal.

The petition is disposed of.

February 16, 2006 ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL )

sanjeev JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.