Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMPHAL & ANOTHER versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ramphal & another v. State of Haryana & another - CRM-37869-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3531 (31 May 2006)

Crl.M.No. 37869 M OF 2006.

******

Ramphal & another vs State of Haryana & another Present : Mr.Bhag Singh, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

*******

The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in complaint, titled as Abhey Ram vs Ramphal and another, filed under Section 3(i), 3(vii) and 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, read with Sections 323/506 of the IPC, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/Ilaqa Magistrate, Kaithal.

Section 18 of the aforementioned Act bars the grant of anticipatory bail, as regards an offence, complained of, under the said Act.

Consequently, the present petition is dismissed. However, in case, the petitioners surrenders, before the trial Court, within a fortnight from today, at 7.30 am, and files an application for regular bail, the same shall be considered and decided, by the trial Court, in accordance with law, on the same day.

( RAJIVE BHALLA )

July 06, 2006. JUDGE

`kk'


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.