Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM KUMAR & ORS versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Kumar & Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-2937-2001 [2006] RD-P&H 3585 (3 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2937 OF 2001

DATE OF DECISION: July 3, 2006.

Parties Name

Ram Kumar and others

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Haryana and others

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal,

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana;

JUDGMENT:

Notice of motion was issued in this writ petition on February 28, 2001, and the parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding possession till further orders. Subsequent thereto on May 7, 2002, this writ petition was admitted and ordered to be listed after decision by the Full Bench of this Court in C.W.P. No. 5877 of 1992. The Full Bench has decided the above said writ petition. Counsel state that similar directions, which were issued by the Full Bench in the said case, be issued in this writ petition as well and the writ petition be disposed of accordingly.

In view of very fair stand taken, this writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in C.W.P. No. 5877 of 1992 (Jai Singh and others v.

State of Haryana and others). Liberty is granted to the petitioners to file application under Section 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regular) Act, 1961, before the competent authority within a period of three months from today. The Collector shall decide the application, if made, expeditiously and till that application is decided, parties shall maintain status quo regarding possession. It is made clear that if no application is filed within the period aforesaid, this writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed.

July 3, 2006. ( Jasbir Singh )

DKC Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.