Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAUR SINGH GILL versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kaur Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-9926-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3654 (4 July 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.

Civil Writ Petition No.9926 of 2006.

Date of decision : 6.7.2006.

Kaur Singh Gill ...Petitioner.

vs.

State of Punjab and others ...Respondents.

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.S.Khehar.

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Kiran Anand Lall.

Present: Mr.V.K.Sandhir,Advocate,for the petitioner.

----

J.S.Khehar, J. (Oral)

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents requiring them to release to him the benefit of handicapped allowance for the period from 28.12.2001 to 14.6.2003. It is also the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner,that for the same relief, the petitioner had issued a legal notice dated 15.4.2006 (Annexure P4). It is further submitted that no decision has been taken thereon till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 i.e. the Director Social Security and Women & Children Development Department, Punjab, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.4.2006 (Annexure P4).

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition with a direction to respondent no.2 i.e. the Director Social Security and Women & Children Development Department, Punjab, Sector 34-A, Chandigarh, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.4.2006 (Annexure P4), by passing a well reasoned speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is found to be entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to him within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti, on payment of usual charges.

(J.S.Khehar)

Judge.

6.7.2006. (Kiran Anand Lall)

vs. Judge.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.