Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SANJEEV MADAN versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sanjeev Madan v. State of Punjab & another - CWP-1011-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3670 (4 July 2006)

C.W.P.No.1011 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Case No. : C.W.P.No.1011 of 2006

Date of Decision : May 25, 2006.

Sanjeev Madan .... Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab & another .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S.Khehar

Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.S.Patwalia

* * *

Present : None for the petitioner.

Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab

for the respondents.

* * *

J.S.Khehar, J. (Oral) :

The controversy in the instant writ petition pertains to the payment of Dearness Allowance on family pension. In so far as the instant issue is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decision rendered by this Court in Mukhtiar Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others (C.W.P.No.891 of 2003, decided on 20.01.2004), based on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Sahib Ram vs. State of Haryana and others, 1994(5) Services Law Reporter 753.

C.W.P.No.1011 of 2006 2

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Union of India and others vs. Smt.

Sujatha Vedachalam and another, (2000) 9 SCC 187. The issue raised by the respondents, based on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Smt.

Sujatha Vedachalam's case (supra) has also been adjudicated upon by this Court in Ranjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and others (C.W.P.No.7907 of 2004, decided on 16.5.2006).

In view of the above, we are satisfied that the instant writ petition deserves to be disposed of in terms of the decision rendered by this Court, in Mukhtiar Singh's case (supra).

The instant writ petition is, accordingly, allowed in the same terms as Mukhtiar Singh's case (supra).

( J.S.Khehar )

Judge

May 25, 2006 ( P.S.Patwalia )

monika Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.