High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Punjab State Electricity Board and other v. Chamkaur Singh - RSA-3882-2001  RD-P&H 3735 (5 July 2006)
R.S.A. No. 3882 of 2001 (O&M)
Date of Decision: January 23, 2006
Punjab State Electricity Board and others .....Appellants
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL.
Present:- Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate
for the appellants.
Mr. B.N. Sehgal, Advocate
for the respondent.
VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The Defendant- Board and others having concurrently lost before both the Courts below has approached this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal.
The facts which emerge from the record show that originally it was contemplated by the Board to charge sheet the plaintiff for misconduct and for imposition of major penalty. On receipt of his reply, a minor penalty was imposed R.S.A. No. 3882 of 2001 (O&M) 
upon him. Increments without cumulative effect were stopped. The plaintiff challenged the aforesaid order of punishment. The two Courts below held that once the Department had initiated proceedings for imposition of major punishment then subsequently, even a minor penalty could not be imposed upon him without following due procedure for imposition of major penalty. Consequently, suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed and the appeal filed by the defendant- Board failed before the learned first Appellate Court.
The controversy in question is squarely covered by a Full Bench judgment of this Court in 2002 (3) RSJ 296, Dr. K.G. Tiwari Vs. State of Haryana and others.
In view of the law laid down by the Full Bench, the judgments rendered by the Courts below cannot be held to be erroneous in any manner.
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal.
January 23, 2006 (VINEY MITTAL)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.