Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Sandeep Kapoor v. State of Haryana - CRM-38545-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3749 (6 July 2006)

Crl.Misc.No.39599 of 2006 &

Crl.M.No. 38545 M OF 2006.


Sandeep Kapoor vs State of Haryana

Present : Mr.Arun Sood, Advocate,

for the petitioner.


Crl.Misc.No.39599 of 2006

Crl. Misc. Application is allowed and the petitioner's affidavit is taken on record.

Crl.Misc.No.38545.M of 2006

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He did not participate in the incident, referred to in the FIR.

Notice of motion to A.G.Haryana for 11.9.2006.

Meanwhile, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions :-

i) that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

ii) that he shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

iii)that he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.


July 14, 2006. JUDGE



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.