Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GURCHAIN SIDHU versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gurchain Sidhu v. The State of Punjab & another. - CWP-9761-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3768 (6 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

....

CWP NO.9761 OF 2006

DATE OF DECISION: 06.07.2006

Gurchain Sidhu ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Punjab & another. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRAN ANAND LALL

Present:- Mr. K.S. Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner.

...

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral)

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner who is a Senior Medical Laboratory Technician seeks a higher pay scale. On the issue in hand, the petitioner is said to have served a legal notice dated 10.3.2006 (Annexure P2) on the respondents. It is, however, pointed out that no decision has been taken thereon till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if the instant writ petition is disposed of by requiring respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, Health and Family Welfare, Punjab Parvar Kalyan Nigam, Sector 34, Chandigarh to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 10.3.2006 (Annexure P2).

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents Nos.1 to 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the writ petition in terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, Health and Family Welfare, Punjab Parvar Kalyan Nigam, Sector 34, Chandigarh, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 10.3.2006 (Annexure P-2), by passing a well reasoned speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is found to be entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to him within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order Dasti, on payment of usual charges.

(J. S. KHEHAR)

JUDGE

(KIRAN ANAND LALL)

July 6, 2006. JUDGE

sn


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.