Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATNAM SINGH PANCH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satnam Singh Panch v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-9990-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 3817 (6 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 9990 of 2006

Date of Decision: 7.07.2006

Satnam Singh Panch

Petitioner

versus

State of Punjab and others

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

Present: Shri T.P.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)

JUDGMENT

Notice of motion.

Shri P.S.Chhina, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State.

In this writ petition, petitioner has laid challenge to the order dated 14.6.2006 (Annexure P/3), vide which, on removal of Sarpanch from her post, Administrator was appointed to manage affairs of the Gram Panchayat village Raipur Peer Bakshwala. Counsel for the petitioner states that under these circumstances, merely because, Sarpanch has been removed, it was not open to the official respondents to appoint an Administrator. To say so, reliance has been placed on ratio of Division Bench judgment of this Court in Nirmala and others v. State of Punjab and others, (CWP No.10822 of 2002), decided on 29.7.2002, wherein it has been so held.

Shri Chhina, when confronted with the ratio of the judgment, referred to above, very fairly states that he will advise respondent No.2 to act in consonance with the law and pass an appropriate order.

CWP No. 9990 of 2006 - 2 -

In view of fair stand taken by the State counsel, this writ petition is disposed of and respondent No.2 is directed to look into grievance of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, keeping in view ratio of judgment in Nirmala's case (supra). Needful be done within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Copy of the order be given dasti under signatures of Court Reader, to the State counsel, for necessary compliance.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

July 07, 2006 ( Pritam Pal )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.