AMIT KUMAR versus USHA RANI

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Amit Kumar v. Usha Rani - FAO-152-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 3902 (10 July 2006)

F.A.O. No. 152-M of 2005 (O&M)

Amit Kumar V. Usha Rani

Present : Shri G.K.Chawla, Advocate,

for the appellant.

Shri Amit Jaswal, Advocate,

for the respondent.

Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)

This appeal has been filed against order dated 6.5.2005 passed under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in favour of the respondent-wife.

Record reveals that the order is ex-parte against the appellant.

Counsel for the appellant states that the order was got passed by concealing material facts. If that is so, the appellant may approach the same Court for necessary relief.

Liberty is granted to the appellant for moving an application for setting-aside the ex-parte order. The trial Court is directed to consider that application sympathetically, if the appellant is in a position to show that a mis-statement had been made by the respondent-wife.

Disposed of in the above terms.

[ JASBIR SINGH ]

JUDGE

[ PRITAM PAL ]

July 14, 2006 JUDGE

som

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.