Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Sunil Kumar @ Vijay Kumar v. State of Punjab & another - CRM-41324-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4026 (13 July 2006)

Crl.M.No. 41324 M OF 2006.


Sunil Kumar @ Vijay Kumar vs State of Punjab & another Present : Mr.N.L.Sharma, Advocate,

for the petitioner.


Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, is for quashing of FIR No.92, dated 17.6.2003, registered under Section 420 of the IPC, at Police Station Kotkapura, District Faridkot.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated, on account of a case of mistaken identity. The petitioner was never employed with Mr. Dinesh Gupta. On the fateful day, the petitioner was present in the office of Mr.Dinesh Gupta in connection with some business. The complainant mistook him for an employee of Mr.Gupta, leading to the implication of the petitioner.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the paper book.

As disputed questions, as to the identity of the petitioner, are involved, these questions are best left to the wisdom of the trial Court.

Consequently, the present petition is dismissed.


July 18, 2006. JUDGE



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.