Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMANDEEP SINGH & ANR versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ramandeep Singh & Anr v. State of Punjab & Ors - CRM-13440-M-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 4038 (13 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.Misc.No.13440-M of 2005

Ramandeep Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab and others Present : Mr. S.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr.B.S. Baath, AAG, Punjab.

Mr.S.S.Narula, Advocate for respondent no.6.

This order shall dispose of Crl.Misc.Nos. 13440-M of 2005 and 23131-M of 2003.

Prayer in this petition, filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is, for the issuance of a writ, order or direction, for transferring the investigation of FIR, to the C.B.I.

Counsel for the State of Punjab submits that the police have prepared an untraced report (Annexure P-14) but the said report has not been presented before the trial Court, on account of the operation of a stay order dated 23.5.2003, passed in Crl.Misc.No.23131-M of 2003.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the respective paper books.

An untraced report has been prepared but on account of a stay operating in Crl.Misc.No.23131-M of 2003, it could not be filed.

Consequently, the Investigating Officer is directed, to file the untraced report forthwith, before a Court of competent jurisdiction. The Court, before which the untraced report is presented, shall thereafter issue notice to the petitioners and in the eventuality of any objections being raised to the acceptance of the untraced report, adjudicate the objections, in accordance with law. Needless to say, with the disposal of Crl.Misc.No.13440-M of 2005, the stay order passed in Crl.Misc.No.23131-M of 2003 stands vacated.

The present petitions stand disposed of accordingly.

14.7.2006 ( RAJIVE BHALLA )

GS JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.