Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

S.C.BHANDARI & ORS versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


S.C.Bhandari & Ors v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and - CWP-5275-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4085 (13 July 2006)

IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.5275 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: July 17, 2006

S.C.Bhandari and others

....Petitioners

VERSUS

Haryana Urban Development Authority and another .....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.PATWALIA

PRESENT: Shri Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Puneet Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

The learned counsel for the parties jointly state that the controversy in the present case is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Gian Inder Sharma v. Haryana Urban Development Authority 2003(1) RCR (Civil), 297.

In view of the agreement of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of in terms of Gian Inder Sharma's case (supra).

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

July 17,2006 (P.S. Patwalia)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.