High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
M/s Oswal Brothrs v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-9494-2006  RD-P&H 4093 (13 July 2006)
DATE OF DECISION: July 13, 2006
M/s Oswal Brothrs
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA
PRESENT: Shri Arun Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the facts as noticed in the appellate order (Annexure P.5) are incorrect as the petitioner was selling the fertiliser after due authority from the manufacturing companies.
We have duly considered the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In our considered opinion, if certain factual position has been incorrectly noticed by the appellate authority, then the appropriate remedy for the petitioner would be to seek a review of the appellate order, if so advised.
Disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to seek review of the order before the appellate authority, if so advised.
A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.
July 13,2006 (H.S. Bhalla)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.