Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SEEMA versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Seema v. Haryana Urban Development Authority and - CWP-10499-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4130 (14 July 2006)

IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.10499 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: July 14, 2006

Seema

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Haryana Urban Development Authority and another .....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

The petitioner claims himself to be an oustee and as such entitled to allotment of plot under the oustee's quota. She claims that after the acquisition of his land, she had applied for allotment of the aforesaid plot, although a long period had elapsed but the necessary relief to the petitioner has not been granted so far.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the record of the case, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive representation within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received, before the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Faridabad.

Alongwith the aforesaid representation, the petitioner shall be required to annex all the necessary documents. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner, then the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Faridabad shall take a final decision upon the aforesaid representation within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed speaking order.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

July 14,2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.