REENA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Reena v. Union of India & Ors - CWP-10703-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4146 (14 July 2006)

IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.10703 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:July 18, 2006

Reena

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Union of India and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Hemant Bassi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that as of today no action whatsoever has been taken for the allotment of retail outlet.

In these circumstances, the grievance made by the petitioner is wholly pre-mature.

Dismissed as pre-mature.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

July 18,2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.