Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUNI RAJ versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Muni Raj v. State of Haryana & Ors. - CWP-2267-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 425 (31 January 2006)

CWP No. 2267 of 2006 Page numbers

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

CWP No. 2267 of 2006

Date of decision: 16.2.2006

Muni Raj

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others.

....Respondent

Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.N. Aggarwal

Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate

for the petitioner.

...

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral).

Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the petitioner was issued a charge-sheet on 16.4.2002, in response to which, the petitioner submitted his reply on 18.5.2002. Despite the passage of about four years since the issuance of the charge-sheet, it is submitted, that no final decision has been taken in the departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner.

The solitary prayer made in the instant writ petition is, that a direction be CWP No. 2267 of 2006 Page numbers

issued to the respondents to conclude the departmental proceedings initiated against the petitioner within a specified time.

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents states, that it is not necessary to file a formal reply to the averments made in the instant writ petition. He undertakes, that if the factual position depicted in the pleadings is correct, then the departmental enquiry will be concluded within six months from today.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conclude the departmental enquiry within six months from today. This shall obviously be subject to the condition,that the petitioner cooperates in the departmental proceedings.

Disposed of accordingly.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge.

(S.N. Aggarwal)

Judge.

16.02.2006

sk.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.