SATISH KUMAR versus THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Satish Kumar v. The Transport Commissioner & Anr - CWP-7269-2000 [2006] RD-P&H 4250 (17 July 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 7269 of 2000

Date of Decision: 24.7.2006

Satish Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

The Transport Commissioner and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

On 1.6.2000, the hearing of the instant petition was adjourned to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file an additional affidavit. No additional affidavit has been filed till date.

Therefore, no adjudication with regard to the rights of the parties would be possible.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

July 24, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.