Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAGJIT SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jagjit Singh v. State of Punjab. - CRM-40283-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4390 (19 July 2006)

Crl.M.No. 40283 M OF 2006.

Jagjit Singh vs State of Punjab & others Present : Mr.Jatinder Singh, Advocate,

for Mr.S.S.Majithia, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Baath, AAG, Punjab,

for respondents No.1 to 3.

*******

Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, is for the issuance of appropriate directions to respondent No.3 to take action against respondents No.4 to 7, in accordance with law, on the basis of the complaint, dated 17.6.2006 (Annexure P-2), filed by the petitioner.

Reply, by way of an affidavit, of Jagdeep Singh Hundal, PPS, DSP, Sub Division Ajnala, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, filed today in Court, is taken on record.

A perusal of the reply reveals that Rajwinder Kaur, daughter of the petitioner, was found from the complex of Gurdwara Ramdass, Amritsar on 28.6.2006 and was brought to the police station, Ramdass. Her parents and relatives were informed. The police recorded her statement, wherein she disclosed that on 16.6.2006, she went to Harmandir Sahib, where she met an old lady. She refused to go with her parents, as her father gave her severe beatings and was compelling her to marry against her wish.

Thereafter, her custody was handed over to her maternal uncle in the presence of her parents.

However, a perusal of the statement of Rajwinder Kaur does disclose a reference to a boy, who was supposed to accompany her. In my considered opinion, it would be appropriate to direct the Superintendent of Crl.Misc.No.40283.M of 2006 : 2 :

Police, Police District Majitha to look into the complaint (Annexure P-2), and in case, it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, proceed, in accordance with law.

The present petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( RAJIVE BHALLA )

July 25, 2006. JUDGE

`kk'


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.