Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LAKHWINDER SINGH versus INDIAN BANK & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lakhwinder Singh v. Indian Bank & Anr - CWP-11126-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4419 (20 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.11126 of 2006

Date of Decision: 24.07.2006

Dr.Lakhwinder Singh

Petitioner

versus

Indian Bank and another

Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

Present: Shri Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)

It is not in dispute that in consequent to the notice issued under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, symbolic possession has already been taken so far as the mortgaged property is concerned. Now that property has been notified for sale. Against taking `symbolic possession', appeal lies. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appeal, if so advised, before the competent authority.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

July 24, 2006 ( Pritam Pal )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.