Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE ROSHIANA versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gram Panchayat Village Roshiana v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-11118-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 4420 (20 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.11118 of 2006

Date of Decision: 24.07.2006

Gram Panchayat Village Roshiana

Petitioner

versus

State of Punjab and others

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITAM PAL

Present: Shri Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral)

Notice of motion. Shri P.S.Chhina, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice.

It is grievance of the petitioner- Gram Panchayat that the State of Punjab has sanctioned grants for development works in its village, instead of sending that amount to the Gram Panchayat, Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Ludhiana has wrongly been appointed as executing agency to spend those grants, contrary to the provisions of Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (in short the Act).

This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Development), Ludhiana, to look into grievance of the petitioner and release the amount of grant in favour of the Gram Panchayat, if there is no legal impediment in doing the same. The order be passed after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and keeping in view the provisions of Sections 30, 86 and 89 of the Act.

Needful be done within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then amount of grant be not spent by the Executing Officers.

Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges to counsel for the petitioner and under signatures of Court Reader, to the State counsel, for necessary compliance.

( Jasbir Singh )

Judge

July 24, 2006 ( Pritam Pal )

gk Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.