Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJINDER PARKASH versus MEENAKSHI ANAND

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajinder Parkash v. Meenakshi Anand - COCP-1401-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 4453 (20 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P. No.1401 of 2005

Date of Decision:- 27.7.2006.

Rajinder Parkash & ors. ....Petitioners

through

Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate.

vs.

Meenakshi Anand & ors. ....Respondents

through

Mr.Narender Sura, AAG, Haryana

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

It is not disputed by learned counsel for the parties that in compliance to the order dated April 28, 2005 passed by this Court in C.W.P.No.4227 of 2005, the petitioners have been paid the arrears of pension and other monetary benefits. However, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the respondents have not paid the pension to the petitioners regularly and they have a genuine apprehension that after disposal of this contempt petition, again the respondent-authorities would start harassing them by not releasing their pension every month regularly.

Mr.Sura, learned AAG, Haryana, however, undertakes that in future there shall be no remiss and the petitioners shall be paid their pension regularly.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the fact that the respondents have now paid arrears of the pension etc., this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in future they shall continue to pay pension to the petitioners on or before 7th day of

every calendar month. In case of any delay, the petitioners shall be entitled to claim interest on such delayed payment which shall be recoverable personally from all those officers who shall be found responsible for delayed payment and no reimbursement of the interest amount shall be permitted from the State exchequer.

Rule stands discharged.

July 27, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.