Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARBHAJAN SINGH versus NAUNIHAL SINGH AND ANR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harbhajan Singh v. Naunihal Singh and anr. - COCP-1412-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 4454 (20 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P. No.1412 of 2005

Date of Decision:- 27.7.2006.

Harbhajan Singh ....Petitioner

through

Mr.S.K.Jain, Advocate.

vs.

Naunihal Singh and anr. ....Respondents

through

Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner filed Crl.Misc.No.7299-M of 2005, which was disposed of by this Court on February 4, 2005 with a direction that the respondents shall complete the investigation within a period of six months and shall produce the whatever report they want to file in the Court.

Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order, this contempt petition has been filed.

In response to the show cause notice, respondent No.1 Sh.Naunihal Singh, IPS Sr. Superintendent of Police, Khanna has filed his affidavit dated 26.7.2006 which is taken on record.

In the aforesaid affidavit, it has been averred that the matter has been re-investigated in terms of the directions issued by this Court and the relevant persons have been joined the investigation and their statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. have also been recorded. A cancellation report was again prepared on 7.12.2005, which was submitted to the Illaqa Magistrate on 18.2.2006. It has also been averred in the affidavit that vide order dated 16.3.2006 (Annexure R-1), the Illaqa Magistrate had accepted the above-stated cancellation report.

In this view of the matter, the directions issued by this Court vide order dated February 4, 2005 have been fully complied with. No further action is required to be taken in these proceedings which are accordingly dropped, however, with liberty to the petitioner to have appropriate recourse, as may be available in accordance with law and if so advised.

Petition is disposed of.

Rule stands discharged.

July 27, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.